Executive Case Study: Signetic

Building and Scaling a Public Health Platform Under Extreme Time Pressure

Situation: Public Health Software in a Crisis Environment

Signetic was a startup focused on vaccination management software, spun out of Leapfrog Technology.
Originally built to support flu vaccination programs, the platform was rapidly repurposed during COVID-19 and became the system used by the City of Seattle and surrounding regions to operate large-scale mass vaccination events, including Lumen Field.

The operating environment was defined by:

  • A global public health emergency
  • Government and public health stakeholders with near-zero tolerance for failure
  • Rapidly evolving policy and reporting requirements
  • Intense public visibility and trust risk

This was not a typical startup context — product decisions directly affected public safety, equity, and public trust.


The Real Problem (Not the Obvious One)

The obvious problem appeared to be:

“How do we build software to schedule and manage vaccinations?”

The real problem was:

How do we create a platform that public health agencies can trust to operate reliably at scale, under uncertainty, while serving diverse and underserved populations?

Quality and clarity were the focus:

  • Missed or duplicate appointments wasted scarce doses
  • Confusing UX excluded elderly and non-technical users
  • Reporting errors eroded confidence with state and federal agencies

Constraints That Defined the Work

Signetic operated under unusually severe constraints:

  • Time pressure: Capabilities were delivered in days and weeks, not quarters
  • Scale volatility: Traffic spiked unpredictably based on supply and eligibility changes
  • Stakeholder complexity: Cities, counties, pharmacies, and public health districts
  • Equity requirements: Access for elderly, homebound, and underserved communities
  • Business uncertainty: Pandemic-driven demand followed by rapid market contraction

Every roadmap decision was shaped by these realities.


Key Leadership and Product Decisions

1. Position Signetic as a managed vaccination solution, not just software

Rather than selling a self-serve SaaS tool, Signetic was intentionally positioned as a managed vaccination platform:

  • Software paired with operational support
  • Clear accountability during live vaccination events
  • Hands-on coordination with public health partners

This framing reduced adoption friction and increased trust with municipalities.


2. Prioritize operational reliability over feature expansion

Product decisions consistently favored:

  • Stability over experimentation
  • Simple, repeatable workflows over customization
  • Proven operational flows over speculative features

This reduced risk during live events serving tens of thousands of people per day.


3. Design explicitly for real-world access and equity

UX and product choices accounted for:

  • Low technical literacy
  • Device and bandwidth constraints
  • Language and accessibility needs

The goal was not elegance, but broad and fair access.


4. Continuously reassess the market as conditions changed

As vaccination demand declined:

  • Addressable market assumptions were revisited
  • Pharmacy and subscription-based models were tested
  • Leadership confronted the limits of pandemic-era growth expectations

Not every expansion effort succeeded, but decisions were revisited quickly and transparently.


Outcomes & Signals

  • Platform supported ~415,000 COVID vaccinations
  • Enabled successful operation of large-scale public vaccination sites
  • Earned sustained trust from public health agencies during peak crisis
  • Demonstrated the ability to scale rapidly under extreme load
  • Surfaced structural challenges in sustaining demand post-pandemic

Just as importantly, the experience clarified where software alone is insufficient without aligned incentives, readiness, and adoption.


What This Case Says About How I Lead

This case reflects how I approach product leadership:

  • I remain calm and decisive in high-stakes environments
  • I prioritize trust and reliability when consequences are real
  • I design products around human constraints, not ideal users
  • I adapt strategy honestly as markets shift
  • I value accountability over optics, especially in crisis situations